<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why keyword density is a waste of time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickstraffictricks.com/1214_why-keyword-density-is-a-waste-of-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickstraffictricks.com/1214_why-keyword-density-is-a-waste-of-time/</link>
	<description>Getting Traffic Is Easy.  Let Me Show You How.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:51:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Mathews</title>
		<link>http://nickstraffictricks.com/1214_why-keyword-density-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-14079</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Mathews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 19:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickstraffictricks.com/?p=1214#comment-14079</guid>
		<description>I agree with what you wrote a good writer focuses on good content not on keyword density. A well written article will include some degree of keyword density,but there is a limit as to as to what is reasonable </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with what you wrote a good writer focuses on good content not on keyword density. A well written article will include some degree of keyword density,but there is a limit as to as to what is reasonable<br />
<span class="cluv">Stan Mathews recently posted..<a class="7415e2fee1 14079" href="http://africanmangoplusreview.com/">African Mango Plus review</a><span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip u 14079" alt="My Profile" style="border:0" width="16" height="14" src="http://nickstraffictricks.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 300 Traffic Tips &#8211; Traffic 101</title>
		<link>http://nickstraffictricks.com/1214_why-keyword-density-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-7089</link>
		<dc:creator>300 Traffic Tips &#8211; Traffic 101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickstraffictricks.com/?p=1214#comment-7089</guid>
		<description>[...] Why keyword density is a waste of time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why keyword density is a waste of time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cross necklaces for</title>
		<link>http://nickstraffictricks.com/1214_why-keyword-density-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-6819</link>
		<dc:creator>cross necklaces for</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickstraffictricks.com/?p=1214#comment-6819</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really look at my keyword density when writing an article. What I do try is get the keywords on the title, the first and last paragraph. The article could be 200 or 500 words or more but if I can get the keywords in where I want them I&#039;m happy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t really look at my keyword density when writing an article. What I do try is get the keywords on the title, the first and last paragraph. The article could be 200 or 500 words or more but if I can get the keywords in where I want them I&#039;m happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 18k gold chain</title>
		<link>http://nickstraffictricks.com/1214_why-keyword-density-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-6675</link>
		<dc:creator>18k gold chain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 04:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickstraffictricks.com/?p=1214#comment-6675</guid>
		<description>Ezinearticles limits keywrod density to 2% and I think that&#039;s about right. 
.-= 18k gold chain&#039;s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://18kgoldchain.net/contact-us/.html&quot;&gt;Contact Us&lt;/a&gt; =-. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ezinearticles limits keywrod density to 2% and I think that&#039;s about right.<br />
.-= 18k gold chain&#039;s last blog ..<a href="http://18kgoldchain.net/contact-us/.html">Contact Us</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stewart</title>
		<link>http://nickstraffictricks.com/1214_why-keyword-density-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-3602</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickstraffictricks.com/?p=1214#comment-3602</guid>
		<description>I think Google prefers naturally written articles too. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google prefers naturally written articles too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Durrant</title>
		<link>http://nickstraffictricks.com/1214_why-keyword-density-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-3597</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Durrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickstraffictricks.com/?p=1214#comment-3597</guid>
		<description>I would rather read a naturally written article than one with keywords added for the sake of it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would rather read a naturally written article than one with keywords added for the sake of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free article directo</title>
		<link>http://nickstraffictricks.com/1214_why-keyword-density-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-3444</link>
		<dc:creator>Free article directo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickstraffictricks.com/?p=1214#comment-3444</guid>
		<description>Yup, I am totally disagree. Keyword density is still important. However I agree that 3%-5% is too much. The good keyword density is 2% - 3%. All keywords synonym also count. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, I am totally disagree. Keyword density is still important. However I agree that 3%-5% is too much. The good keyword density is 2% &#8211; 3%. All keywords synonym also count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://nickstraffictricks.com/1214_why-keyword-density-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-3425</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickstraffictricks.com/?p=1214#comment-3425</guid>
		<description>Ya i didnt even know about keyword density till just now i never even thought that it matter i never focused on it. lol </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya i didnt even know about keyword density till just now i never even thought that it matter i never focused on it. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

